[Bug preprocessor/8270] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] back-slash white space newline with comments, no warning

2013-12-13 Thread GoWhoopee at yahoo dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8270 --- Comment #51 from GoWhoopee at yahoo dot com --- http://web.cs.dal.ca/~vlado/pl/C_Standard_2011-n1570.pdf That's the principle, but not what happens with gcc... Phase 2 says, Each instance of a backslash character (\) immediately followed by a

[Bug preprocessor/8270] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] back-slash white space newline with comments, no warning

2013-12-13 Thread GoWhoopee at yahoo dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8270 --- Comment #52 from GoWhoopee at yahoo dot com --- Whitespace is required by Translation Phase 3, consequently Translation Phase 1 should not be changing whitespace at all, only mapping multibyte characters and trigraphs. Comment #39: Indicates

[Bug preprocessor/8270] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] back-slash white space newline with comments, no warning

2013-12-12 Thread GoWhoopee at yahoo dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8270 --- Comment #49 from GoWhoopee at yahoo dot com --- I've read all the comments and all those on linked forums and I have no idea how you struggle with this! If a compiler changes backslash space into backslash newline and consequently deletes the

[Bug preprocessor/8270] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] back-slash white space newline with comments, no warning

2013-12-12 Thread mikpelinux at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8270 Mikael Pettersson mikpelinux at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikpelinux

[Bug preprocessor/8270] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] back-slash white space newline with comments, no warning

2013-12-11 Thread GoWhoopee at yahoo dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8270 GoWhoopee at yahoo dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||GoWhoopee at yahoo dot com

[Bug preprocessor/8270] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] back-slash white space newline with comments, no warning

2013-12-11 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8270 --- Comment #48 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to GoWhoopee from comment #47) Please reconsider and stop gcc from changing our code without our permission. It is not changing your code at all. Read comment #39 to

[Bug preprocessor/8270] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] back-slash white space newline with comments, no warning

2013-04-12 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8270 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.6.4 |4.7.4