--- Additional Comments From pcarlini at suse dot de 2005-02-16 10:58
---
That test is accessing str_lit01 beyond its end, I'm fixing it.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-16 06:27
---
Changed from fail with Tue Feb 15 18:04:03 UTC 2005
to pass with Wed Feb 16 04:21:14 UTC 2005
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19829
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-16
06:31 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
Changed from fail with Tue Feb 15 18:04:03 UTC 2005
to pass with Wed Feb 16 04:21:14 UTC 2005
werid because there does not look anything (at least to my eyes) which could
have
--- Additional Comments From hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-14 22:25
---
I'm reopening this bug as I see the regression with LAST_UPDATED
Mon Feb 14 15:49:50 UTC 2005 (on a stable machine this time)
where I did not see it with Mon Feb 14 07:18:25 UTC 2005.
Keeping this PR open until
--- Additional Comments From hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-10 06:16
---
On two different systems, each:
Gone with LAST_UPDATED: Wed Feb 9 17:26:30 UTC 2005
(Was still there with Wed Feb 9 07:18:07 UTC 2005)
Gone with LAST_UPDATED: Thu Feb 10 02:25:27 UTC 2005
(Was still there
--- Additional Comments From hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-10 06:18
---
Um wait, ignore that conclusion and the first range in comment #1.
Flaky machine...
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19829
