http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47836
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47836
Roger Meyer fzvqedi at v dot mintemail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fzvqedi at v
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47836
--- Comment #16 from Hans-Peter Nilsson hp at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-27
20:55:03 UTC ---
Author: hp
Date: Mon Jun 27 20:54:59 2011
New Revision: 175560
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=175560
Log:
PR regression/47836
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47836
--- Comment #17 from Hans-Peter Nilsson hp at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-27
21:02:59 UTC ---
Author: hp
Date: Mon Jun 27 21:02:53 2011
New Revision: 175564
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=175564
Log:
PR regression/47836
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47836
--- Comment #15 from th.r.klein at web dot de 2011-06-24 11:10:27 UTC ---
The commit helps suppress building of target-libiberty.
But there is still a try to build target-zlib.
Isn't it possible to add a manual switch to prevent building of such
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47836
--- Comment #13 from Hans-Peter Nilsson hp at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-22
20:17:55 UTC ---
Author: hp
Date: Wed Jun 22 20:17:47 2011
New Revision: 175307
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=175307
Log:
PR regression/47836
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47836
--- Comment #14 from Hans-Peter Nilsson hp at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-22
21:30:24 UTC ---
Author: hp
Date: Wed Jun 22 21:30:19 2011
New Revision: 175316
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=175316
Log:
PR regression/47836
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47836
--- Comment #12 from joseph at codesourcery dot com joseph at codesourcery dot
com 2011-03-02 16:50:20 UTC ---
I do not believe any component of the GCC or src tree uses a target
libiberty. Thus, I do not think such a target libiberty should be
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47836
--- Comment #11 from Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-02
05:57:38 UTC ---
The automatic enabling of zlib was turned on by revision 152434, a merge of the
lto branch. It seems you can use --disable-lto or --with-system-zlib to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47836
--- Comment #10 from th.r.klein at web dot de 2011-02-28 19:52:12 UTC ---
If you can't imagine how to get a usable C++ compiler without libstdc++-v3 (and
libc), please stop wasting your time in thinking about it.
Here is no C++ problem at all.
If
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47836
--- Comment #8 from th.r.klein at web dot de 2011-02-27 09:23:44 UTC ---
Exactly this is the current problem, there is neither a working switch like
--disable-target-zlib nor a working --disable-target-libiberty.
(sorry if confusing you by using
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47836
--- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-27
22:31:48 UTC ---
have libstdc++-v3, too.
Then you cannot use the C++ compiler really. So why compile it?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47836
--- Comment #7 from Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-26
15:34:12 UTC ---
It should generally work to pass --disable-target-zlib, and similar for other
target directories, as workarounds. If it doesn't work, that's worth a bug
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47836
--- Comment #6 from th.r.klein at web dot de 2011-02-24 19:42:39 UTC ---
Since I did not need to have libc I also did not need to have libstdc++-v3,
too.
Also I did not need to have libgomp, libmudflap, libffi, libssp, libquadmath,
boehm-gc ..
But
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47836
--- Comment #4 from th.r.klein at web dot de 2011-02-23 17:56:54 UTC ---
The original failing process was:
../../env/src/configure --prefix=${HOME}/local --with-mpc=${HOME}/local
--with-mpfr=${HOME}/local --with-gmp=${HOME}/local
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47836
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-23
20:11:09 UTC ---
--enable-languages=c,c++
Where you really able to build libstdc++ without libc? I doubt that. Try just
enabling C first and then build newlib. Or are you
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47836
--- Comment #2 from th.r.klein at web dot de 2011-02-22 19:39:27 UTC ---
For example a microcontroller do not need to have any kind of standard
C-Library files or its header files.
So it is not possible to build e.g. zlib or libiberty for this
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47836
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47836
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-21
19:20:20 UTC ---
Why does these libraries fail?
19 matches
Mail list logo
