https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110939
Xi Ruoyao changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||prathamesh3492 at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110939
Xi Ruoyao changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zsojka at seznam dot cz
--- Comment #15 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110939
Xi Ruoyao changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110939
--- Comment #13 from Xi Ruoyao ---
The patch is pushed. I'm running a bootstrap and I'll close this PR after it
successes.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110939
Xi Ruoyao changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2023-08-08 00:00:00 |2023-08-26
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110939
Xi Ruoyao changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110939
Xi Ruoyao changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xen0n at gentoo dot org
--- Comment #12 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110939
--- Comment #11 from Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-August/627024.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110939
--- Comment #10 from Chenghui Pan ---
(In reply to Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus from comment #9)
> Thanks for the reproducer and sorry for the hassle.
>
> The normal form of a constant for a mode with fewer bits than in
> HOST_WIDE_INT is a sign
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110939
--- Comment #9 from Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus
---
Thanks for the reproducer and sorry for the hassle.
The normal form of a constant for a mode with fewer bits than in HOST_WIDE_INT
is a sign extended version of the original constant. This e
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110939
--- Comment #8 from Chenghui Pan ---
(In reply to Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus from comment #6)
> I tried to reproduce it with a cross compiler while using the reproducer
> from PR110867 without getting an ICE. Can you attach a pre processed sou
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110939
--- Comment #7 from Chenghui Pan ---
Created attachment 55706
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55706&action=edit
preprocessed file of gcc/tree-cfgcleanup.cc, ICE occurred in this place.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110939
--- Comment #6 from Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus
---
I tried to reproduce it with a cross compiler while using the reproducer from
PR110867 without getting an ICE. Can you attach a pre processed source file
and a corresponding gcc invocation?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110939
Xi Ruoyao changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|DUPLICATE |---
Ever confirmed|1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110939
--- Comment #4 from Chenghui Pan ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> I think this was reported before (and fixed by r14-2932-g41ef5a34161356).
> Can you try again with updated GCC?
I still get the exact same ICE message with upd
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110939
Xi Ruoyao changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110939
--- Comment #2 from Chenghui Pan ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> I think this was reported before (and fixed by r14-2932-g41ef5a34161356).
> Can you try again with updated GCC?
Ok, I clone a new copy of codes and is bootstra
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110939
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||stefansf at linux dot ibm.com
Ever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110939
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||build, ice-on-valid-code
Sum
19 matches
Mail list logo
