https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116185
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116185
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116185
Bug 116185 depends on bug 116058, which changed state.
Bug 116058 Summary: [15 Regression] sh4-linux-gnu fails to bootstrap, late
combine issue
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116058
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116185
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
Note the original testcase seems to invoke a similar issue in gcse too. But why
there was no difference previously I have no idea.
Without:
```
(insn # # # 2 (set (reg/f:SI 296)
(symbol_ref:SI ("_Z1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116185
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
> Hmm, for my reduced testcase, the first issue is in gcse (pre) and it
> started there in GCC 14.1.0 according to godbolt. So it looks like I reduced
> a differen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116185
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Hmm, for my reduced testcase, the first issue is in gcse (pre) and it started
there in GCC 14.1.0 according to godbolt. So it looks like I reduced a
different compare debug issue as the original one is not t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116185
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 58802
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58802&action=edit
Reduced testcase
`-fcompare-debug -fno-exceptions -fno-rtti -O2 -gno-statement-frontiers` is
able to reproduce
