https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15482
Richard Earnshaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
--- Comment #6 from ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-09 23:59 ---
void bar(int, int, int, int);
Corrected testcase
void bar (int, int , int);
int x;
int foo (int a1, int a2, int a3)
{
int b;
__asm volatile("mov %0, #0":"=r" (b)::
"r3", "r4", "r5", "r6", "r7"
--- Comment #5 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2008-02-12 21:11 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> I see the same problem at any level of optimization I have tried on
> i686-apple-darwin9 for the test case gcc.target/i386/asm-3.c:
>
> [ibook-dhum] f90/bug% /opt/gcc/gcc4.3w/bin/gcc -O0
> /opt/
--- Comment #4 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2008-01-11 09:35 ---
I see the same problem at any level of optimization I have tried on
i686-apple-darwin9 for the test case gcc.target/i386/asm-3.c:
[ibook-dhum] f90/bug% /opt/gcc/gcc4.3w/bin/gcc -O0
/opt/gcc/_gcc_clean/gcc/testsuite/g
