--- Additional Comments From gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-30 13:44
---
Chnages to fix this bug would happen in the middle=end which is risky at
this point. Therefore it won't be fixed for 3.3.6. It fixed in 3.4.0 though.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-28 08:23
---
(In reply to comment #6)
> Um... first of all, this works on 3.4 branch only by accident, i.e. I think
> the
> underlying problem is still present there. What happens is that a call has an
> argument containin
--- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-25
16:42 ---
Stepping down for now.
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu
--- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-24
11:27 ---
Um... first of all, this works on 3.4 branch only by accident, i.e. I think the
underlying problem is still present there. What happens is that a call has an
argument containing a TARGET_EXPR with cleanup
--- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-24
07:53 ---
Fixing.
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |ebotcazou
--- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-23
14:49 ---
A sibcall problem, hence the workaround -O2 -fno-optimize-sibling-calls.
--
What|Removed |Added
---
