[Bug rtl-optimization/18628] [4.0/4.1 regression] miscompilation of switch statement in loop

2005-03-14 Thread aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-14 23:43 --- Fixed -- What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug rtl-optimization/18628] [4.0/4.1 regression] miscompilation of switch statement in loop

2005-03-14 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-14 20:32 --- Subject: Bug 18628 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Branch: gcc-4_0-branch Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-14 20:32:50 Modified files: gcc: Change

[Bug rtl-optimization/18628] [4.0/4.1 regression] miscompilation of switch statement in loop

2005-03-14 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-14 20:06 --- Subject: Bug 18628 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-14 20:06:23 Modified files: gcc: ChangeLog cse.c gcc/testsuit

[Bug rtl-optimization/18628] [4.0/4.1 regression] miscompilation of switch statement in loop

2005-03-11 Thread rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-11 12:45 --- Subject: Re: [PR middle-end/18628] do not fold to label load from tablejump to reg On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 05:37:48PM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote: > * cse.c (fold_rtx_mem): Don't fold a load from a jump

[Bug rtl-optimization/18628] [4.0/4.1 regression] miscompilation of switch statement in loop

2005-03-10 Thread law at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From law at redhat dot com 2005-03-11 00:51 --- Subject: Re: [PR middle-end/18628] do not fold to label load from tablejump to reg On Thu, 2005-03-10 at 17:37 -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote: > On Mar 10, 2005, Richard Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >

[Bug rtl-optimization/18628] [4.0/4.1 regression] miscompilation of switch statement in loop

2005-03-10 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-10 23:13 --- (In reply to comment #27) > I've just built qt334/kde340(core) with -march=i686 -O/-O2. > They are totally broken (damaged grahpics/widgets) :/ > I don't have a testcase at this moment but gcc4 has a serio

[Bug rtl-optimization/18628] [4.0/4.1 regression] miscompilation of switch statement in loop

2005-03-10 Thread pluto at pld-linux dot org
--- Additional Comments From pluto at pld-linux dot org 2005-03-10 23:00 --- I've just built qt334/kde340(core) with -march=i686 -O/-O2. They are totally broken (damaged grahpics/widgets) :/ I don't have a testcase at this moment but gcc4 has a serious bug. -- http://gcc.gnu.org

[Bug rtl-optimization/18628] [4.0/4.1 regression] miscompilation of switch statement in loop

2005-03-10 Thread aoliva at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-10 20:38 --- Subject: Re: [PR middle-end/18628] do not fold to label load from tablejump to reg On Mar 10, 2005, Richard Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 07:26:37AM -0300, Alexandre Oliva

[Bug rtl-optimization/18628] [4.0/4.1 regression] miscompilation of switch statement in loop

2005-03-10 Thread rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-10 13:46 --- Subject: Re: [PR middle-end/18628] do not fold to label load from tablejump to reg On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 07:26:37AM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote: > + /* If it's not a REG, the REG_EQUAL note is i