This error only seems to occur when "-O2 -march=k6-2 -ftracer" are used
together.  Removing -ftracer causes the error to go away.  This problem does not
seem to exist in the GCC4.0 branch.

i686-pc-linux-gnu-gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I../include -O20 -ffast-math
-D_REENTRANT -fsigned-char -march=k6-2 -ftracer -O2 -mno-sse2 -fPIC
-DUSE_MEMORY_H -MT psy.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/psy.Tpo -c psy.c  -fPIC -DPIC -o
.libs/psy.o -save-temps
psy.s: Assembler messages:
psy.s:6581: Error: value of ffffffffffffff7f too large for field of 1 bytes at
0000000000000428


gcc -v
Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/3.4.3-20050110/specs
Configured with: /var/tmp/portage/gcc-3.4.3.20050110-r1/work/gcc-3.4.3/configure
--enable-version-specific-runtime-libs --prefix=/usr
--bindir=/usr/i686-pc-linux-gnu/gcc-bin/3.4.3-20050110
--includedir=/usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/3.4.3-20050110/include
--datadir=/usr/share/gcc-data/i686-pc-linux-gnu/3.4.3-20050110
--mandir=/usr/share/gcc-data/i686-pc-linux-gnu/3.4.3-20050110/man
--infodir=/usr/share/gcc-data/i686-pc-linux-gnu/3.4.3-20050110/info
--with-gxx-include-dir=/usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/3.4.3-20050110/include/g++-v3
--host=i686-pc-linux-gnu --disable-altivec --enable-nls
--without-included-gettext --enable-__cxa_atexit --disable-sjlj-exceptions
--enable-clocale=gnu --with-system-zlib --disable-checking --disable-werror
--disable-libunwind-exceptions --disable-multilib --disable-libgcj
--enable-languages=c,c++ --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix
Thread model: posix
gcc version 3.4.3-20050110 (Gentoo Linux 3.4.3.20050110-r1,
ssp-3.4.3.20050110-0, pie-8.7.7)

-- 
           Summary: 3.4 assembler error - value too large for field on k6-2
           Product: gcc
           Version: 3.4.4
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: rtl-optimization
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: halcy0n at gentoo dot org
                CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20653

Reply via email to