[Bug rtl-optimization/21676] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] Optimizer regression: SciMark sparse matrix benchmark

2006-08-15 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-16 06:50 --- Can someone try the mainline again after Paolo B.'s patch? -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug rtl-optimization/21676] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] Optimizer regression: SciMark sparse matrix benchmark

2006-08-16 Thread uros at kss-loka dot si
--- Comment #6 from uros at kss-loka dot si 2006-08-16 12:15 --- IMO the problem here is in IVopts. Using gcc-3.x, the innermost loop compiles to: .L15: movl(%edi,%edx,4), %eax fldl(%ebp,%edx,8) addl$1, %edx fmull (%esi,%eax,8) cmpl

[Bug rtl-optimization/21676] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] Optimizer regression: SciMark sparse matrix benchmark

2006-08-17 Thread uros at kss-loka dot si
--- Comment #7 from uros at kss-loka dot si 2006-08-17 07:21 --- (In reply to comment #6) > I think that remaining time difference is due to strange loop above innermost: ... due to strange _header_ above innermost loop ... The problem is that we load zero in both arms of "if". This

[Bug rtl-optimization/21676] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] Optimizer regression: SciMark sparse matrix benchmark

2006-08-17 Thread uros at kss-loka dot si
--- Comment #8 from uros at kss-loka dot si 2006-08-17 07:45 --- Also interesting is, that -march=pentium4 produces following "de-optimized" code, adding a couple more instructions and wasting %eax register: .L8: leal(%ebx,%ebx), %eax movl40(%esp), %edx m

[Bug rtl-optimization/21676] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] Optimizer regression: SciMark sparse matrix benchmark

2006-08-28 Thread uros at kss-loka dot si
--- Comment #10 from uros at kss-loka dot si 2006-08-29 06:12 --- (In reply to comment #9) > Fixed on the mainline by: > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-08/msg01036.html Not really, the above patch fixed only one of three problems. The other two remains, that is: - ivopts proble

[Bug rtl-optimization/21676] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] Optimizer regression: SciMark sparse matrix benchmark

2006-06-04 Thread jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Optimizer regression: |[4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] |SciMark sparse matrix

[Bug rtl-optimization/21676] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] Optimizer regression: SciMark sparse matrix benchmark

2006-06-04 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-04 20:06 --- It would be nice if we could get 4.1.x numbers. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added -

[Bug rtl-optimization/21676] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] Optimizer regression: SciMark sparse matrix benchmark

2006-06-06 Thread gcc at pdoerfler dot com
--- Comment #3 from gcc at pdoerfler dot com 2006-06-06 11:22 --- I get the following with -O3 -march=pentium4 -fomit-frame-pointer on a pentium4 gentoo machine: gcc-3.4.6 gcc-4.0.2 gcc-4.1.1 2.69s 4.14s 3.26s These are all with gentoo's patches. Also, current mainl

[Bug rtl-optimization/21676] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] Optimizer regression: SciMark sparse matrix benchmark

2006-07-10 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-10 12:45 --- I get on a Pentium 4, -O3 -march=pentium4 -fomit-frame-pointer -o bench Random.i SparseCompRow.i array.i kernel.i main.i 3.4.6: 3.48s 4.0.3: 4.44s 4.1.1: 4.12s 4.2.0: 4.13s -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org cha