--- Comment #14 from rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-16 17:23 ---
Subject: Bug 24160
Author: rth
Date: Wed Nov 16 17:23:23 2005
New Revision: 107093
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=107093
Log:
PR rtl-opt/24160
PR target/24621
* reload1.c
--- Comment #15 from rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-16 17:27 ---
Fixed.
--
rth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #5 from janis187 at us dot ibm dot com 2005-10-03 22:26 ---
A regression hunt using an i686-linux cross compiler with the testcase from
comment #3 identifies this patch from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2005-03/msg00534.html
That doesn't fit with the s
--- Comment #6 from drab at kepler dot fjfi dot cvut dot cz 2005-10-04
09:06 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
OK, then there are two questions:
1) Is the testcase from Comment #3 really hitting the same bug? since when I
compile my original test case with -O1 -ftree-vectorize -msse it wor
--- Comment #7 from uros at kss-loka dot si 2005-10-04 11:38 ---
(In reply to comment #6)
>
> 1) Is the testcase from Comment #3 really hitting the same bug? since when I
> compile my original test case with -O1 -ftree-vectorize -msse it works, but
> then again the reduction might caus
--- Comment #8 from uros at kss-loka dot si 2005-10-04 11:44 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> A regression hunt using an i686-linux cross compiler with the testcase from
> comment #3 identifies this patch from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2005-03/msg00534.html
N
--- Comment #9 from uros at kss-loka dot si 2005-10-04 12:45 ---
The problem here is that we are out of GENERAL_REGS at the point of. This can
be seen in code, produced with -fomit-frame-pointer:
...
.L4:
movl1052(%esp), %edx
movl%ebp, (%edx,%ecx,4) <
--- Comment #10 from uros at kss-loka dot si 2005-10-04 12:57 ---
(In reply to comment #9)
Sorry for typing too fast... Of course, load of %ebp is here:
foo:
pushl %ebp
pushl %edi
pushl %esi
pushl %ebx
subl$1032, %esp
leal
--- Comment #11 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-04 13:10
---
> BTW: Peerhaps a tree expert could look into an optimized tree dump, maybe
> something can be done there.
I doubt it. Unless you find that:
q.0 = (int) &q;
r = &q + (char *) (((long unsigned int) q.0 + 3) /
--- Comment #12 from drab at kepler dot fjfi dot cvut dot cz 2005-10-04
14:38 ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> As further evidence, using -fomit-frame-pointer, I was not able to produce an
> ICE for any testcase in this bugreport.
I was under the impression that -fomit-frame-pointer is e
--- Comment #13 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-31 06:00
---
This is a showstopper.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
rth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
12 matches
Mail list logo
