https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26493
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26493
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26493
--- Comment #9 from Kristis Makris mkgnu at mkgnu dot net ---
I won't see, open or read your email.
I won't even know you emailed me.
If there's something you want me to do you have to use this:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26493
--- Comment #10 from Kristis Makris mkgnu at mkgnu dot net ---
I won't see, open or read your email.
I won't even know you emailed me.
If there's something you want me to do you have to use this:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26493
--- Comment #11 from Kristis Makris mkgnu at mkgnu dot net ---
I won't see, open or read your email.
I won't even know you emailed me.
If there's something you want me to do you have to use this:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26493
--- Comment #12 from Kristis Makris mkgnu at mkgnu dot net ---
Please revise and resubmit. I can't tell clearly why whatever it is you are
asking is important.
--- Comment #6 from mkgnu at mkgnu dot net 2007-04-30 23:42 ---
It seems that when I use -freorder-blocks-and-partition along with
-fprofile-use (after I have already run once an executable compiled with
-freorder-blocks-and-partition -fprofile-generate) I can produce an object file
--- Comment #7 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-30 23:48 ---
(In reply to comment #6)
But when I try to further link this object file with other object files to
produce an executable, the .text.unlikely section is missing from the final
executable. I've tried this with
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-24 20:27 ---
*** Bug 31689 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from mkgnu at mkgnu dot net 2007-04-25 02:12 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
I've tried a couple of different ways to use branch predictions for
partitioning, but it never leads to meaningful results. Either everything is
hot or everything is cold. I don't know what
--- Comment #3 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-13 22:41 ---
I've tried a couple of different ways to use branch predictions for
partitioning, but it never leads to meaningful results. Either everything is
hot or everything is cold. I don't know what else to do about this.
11 matches
Mail list logo
