--- Comment #12 from zadeck at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-23 01:18 ---
Subject: Bug 26855
Author: zadeck
Date: Tue May 23 01:17:29 2006
New Revision: 114010
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=114010
Log:
2006-05-22 Kenneth Zadeck [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #11 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-21 20:49
---
Subject: Bug 26855
Author: pinskia
Date: Sun May 21 20:48:30 2006
New Revision: 113960
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=113960
Log:
Add forgot changelog:
+2006-05-19 Daniel Berlin [EMAIL
--- Comment #10 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-20 18:54
---
Fixed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #9 from zadeck at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-19 21:18 ---
Subject: Bug 26855
Author: zadeck
Date: Fri May 19 21:18:23 2006
New Revision: 113915
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=113915
Log:
2006-05-19 Daniel Berlin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Kenneth
--- Comment #7 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-29 00:02 ---
I tried the patch at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-04/msg01061.html on
powerpc64-linux and used the resulting compilers with -O2 -fmodulo-sched to
build SPEC CPU2000 and run with the small, test input, and
--- Comment #8 from zadeck at naturalbridge dot com 2006-04-29 04:23
---
Subject: Re: [4.2 Regression] ICE in add_deps_for_def
with -fmodulo-sched -maltivec
janis at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
--- Comment #7 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-29 00:02 ---
I tried
--- Comment #3 from zadeck at naturalbridge dot com 2006-04-26 14:50
---
Yes janis, it is quite likely that that patch will fix this problem.
This looks like exactly the same failure as the other bug that that this patch
was submitted for.
--
--- Comment #4 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-26 17:48 ---
The patch doesn't apply cleanly now, which isn't surprising, but it also
doesn't apply to mainline sources as of 2006-03-28, when it was submitted.
What date or revision can I start with to try this patch, without
--- Comment #5 from zadeck at naturalbridge dot com 2006-04-26 20:51
---
Subject: Re: [4.2 Regression] ICE in add_deps_for_def
with -fmodulo-sched -maltivec
janis at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
--- Comment #4 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-26 17:48 ---
The patch
--- Comment #6 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-26 20:54 ---
Thanks, although I can wait if you have more pressing things to do.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26855
--- Comment #2 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-25 23:49 ---
The patch that introduced this failure also causes the same ICE in several SPEC
CPU2000 programs on powerpc64-linux for -O2 -fmodulo-sched with either -m32
or -m64. I haven't tried the patch that was supposed to fix
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot
|
13 matches
Mail list logo
