[Bug rtl-optimization/30065] Could use indexed addressing to reduce const costs

2017-11-06 Thread egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30065 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug rtl-optimization/30065] Could use indexed addressing to reduce const costs

2017-08-06 Thread egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30065 --- Comment #8 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #7) > (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #6) > > > > Can I change the status to SUSPENDED or assign them to you instead? I'm not > > so much trying to reduce the

[Bug rtl-optimization/30065] Could use indexed addressing to reduce const costs

2017-08-06 Thread olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30065 --- Comment #7 from Oleg Endo --- (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #6) > > Can I change the status to SUSPENDED or assign them to you instead? I'm not > so much trying to reduce the number of open PRs as I am trying to just move > them

[Bug rtl-optimization/30065] Could use indexed addressing to reduce const costs

2017-08-03 Thread egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30065 --- Comment #6 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #5) > (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #4) > > (In reply to Steven Bosscher from comment #3) > > > Is there a test case for this PR? > > > > Reporter never

[Bug rtl-optimization/30065] Could use indexed addressing to reduce const costs

2017-08-03 Thread olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30065 Oleg Endo changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|INVALID

[Bug rtl-optimization/30065] Could use indexed addressing to reduce const costs

2017-08-03 Thread egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30065 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug rtl-optimization/30065] Could use indexed addressing to reduce const costs

2009-03-15 Thread steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-03-15 23:35 --- Is there a test case for this PR? -- steven at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug rtl-optimization/30065] Could use indexed addressing to reduce const costs

2006-12-09 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-09 22:44 --- Confirmed. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug rtl-optimization/30065] Could use indexed addressing to reduce const costs

2006-12-04 Thread amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-04 19:14 --- Created an attachment (id=12742) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12742action=view) tentative patch This patch implements this optimization, although it could be improved to consider more possible