--- Comment #13 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-07 12:15
---
*** Bug 22031 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #12 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-07 10:16
---
Fixed.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNE
--- Comment #11 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-07 10:15
---
Subject: Bug 42617
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Apr 7 10:15:05 2010
New Revision: 158048
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=158048
Log:
2010-04-07 Richard Guenther
PR middle-end/42617
--- Comment #10 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-07 10:14
---
Subject: Bug 42617
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Apr 7 10:14:17 2010
New Revision: 158046
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=158046
Log:
2010-04-07 Richard Guenther
PR middle-end/42617
--- Comment #9 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-07 10:13 ---
Subject: Bug 42617
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Apr 7 10:13:25 2010
New Revision: 158045
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=158045
Log:
2010-04-07 Richard Guenther
PR middle-end/42617
--- Comment #8 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-08 18:45 ---
FWIW, bootstrap+regtest succeeds on ia64-unknown-linux-gnu with the patch set
applied.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42617
--- Comment #7 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-22 15:24 ---
With these patches I get for
void foo(int * __restrict__ a, int * __restrict__ b, int * __restrict__ c,
int N)
{
int i;
for (i = 0; i < N; ++i)
a[i] = b[i] + c[i];
}
and -O2 -funroll-all-loops all
--- Comment #6 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-22 15:21 ---
Created an attachment (id=19694)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19694&action=view)
patch #2
Fix for expanding TARGET_MEM_REFs.
The patch series is queued for early GCC 4.6 because of its side-e
--- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-22 14:07 ---
Created an attachment (id=19692)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19692&action=view)
patch #1
Don't throw away points-to information needlessly.
Remaining: expand TARGET_MEM_REFs in a more meanin
--- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-22 14:06 ---
Created an attachment (id=19691)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19691&action=view)
patch #0
Fix INDIRECT_REFs.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-19 17:02 ---
Created an attachment (id=19658)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19658&action=view)
tentative fix
Patch for testing, should work for all cases (fingers crossing).
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzi
--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-19 16:29 ---
Mine anyway.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|una
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
Keywords||alias, mi
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-04 23:25 ---
See http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-11/msg00463.html for a half-way
working
patch. Somebody needs to dive into var-tracking.c and fix the fallout.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
Wh
14 matches
Mail list logo
