[Bug rtl-optimization/46865] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] Using -save-temps (or ccache, distcc) produces different results with multiline macros containing asm code

2010-12-10 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46865 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.6.0 Summary|[4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6

[Bug rtl-optimization/46865] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] Using -save-temps (or ccache, distcc) produces different results with multiline macros containing asm code

2010-12-10 Thread juha.kallioinen at nokia dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46865 --- Comment #6 from Juha Kallioinen 2010-12-10 13:14:14 UTC --- Thanks for the quick work! How does this get backported to 4.3 or 4.4 then? I can see the patch directly applies to 4.5.1, but not to 4.4.5 (rtl.c: rtx_equal_p is too different in i

[Bug rtl-optimization/46865] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] Using -save-temps (or ccache, distcc) produces different results with multiline macros containing asm code

2011-01-16 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46865 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-01-16 20:14:53 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Sun Jan 16 20:14:37 2011 New Revision: 168862 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168862 Log: Backport from mainline 2010-12-10 Jakub Je

[Bug rtl-optimization/46865] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] Using -save-temps (or ccache, distcc) produces different results with multiline macros containing asm code

2011-01-16 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46865 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-01-16 22:53:13 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Sun Jan 16 22:53:09 2011 New Revision: 168877 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168877 Log: Backport from mainline 2010-12-10 Jakub Je