[Bug rtl-optimization/47612] RTL crash when cc0 setter moved away from cc0 user

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47612 --- Comment #19 from Joel Sherrill 2011-12-13 19:10:10 UTC --- Time to close this?

[Bug rtl-optimization/47612] RTL crash when cc0 setter moved away from cc0 user

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47612 --- Comment #20 from Mikael Pettersson 2011-12-13 19:40:19 UTC --- (In reply to comment #19) > Time to close this? Not until the patch gets applied to gcc-4.6 branch.

[Bug rtl-optimization/47612] RTL crash when cc0 setter moved away from cc0 user

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47612 Joel Sherrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug rtl-optimization/47612] RTL crash when cc0 setter moved away from cc0 user

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47612 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla

[Bug rtl-optimization/47612] RTL crash when cc0 setter moved away from cc0 user

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47612 --- Comment #3 from Ian Lance Taylor 2011-02-04 21:27:40 UTC --- It's similar to PR 46878 in that this is also CC0 related, but it is different code that is splitting up the CC0 setter and the CC0 user. My sources do include the patch for PR 468

[Bug rtl-optimization/47612] RTL crash when cc0 setter moved away from cc0 user

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47612 Mikael Pettersson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bernds at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug rtl-optimization/47612] RTL crash when cc0 setter moved away from cc0 user

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47612 Vincent Riviere changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vincent.riviere at freesbee

[Bug rtl-optimization/47612] RTL crash when cc0 setter moved away from cc0 user

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47612 --- Comment #6 from Vincent Riviere 2011-04-02 12:13:57 UTC --- Created attachment 23850 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23850 Testcase Here is my simplified testcase. It looks weird, but I didn't manage to simplify more. It

[Bug rtl-optimization/47612] RTL crash when cc0 setter moved away from cc0 user

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47612 Bernd Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassigned at

[Bug rtl-optimization/47612] RTL crash when cc0 setter moved away from cc0 user

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47612 --- Comment #8 from Vincent Riviere 2011-04-06 17:07:26 UTC --- Excellent! Your patch fixes both testcases here.

[Bug rtl-optimization/47612] RTL crash when cc0 setter moved away from cc0 user

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47612 --- Comment #9 from Bernd Schmidt 2011-04-06 17:28:43 UTC --- Any chance you can run the testsuite before/after the patch? m68k is problematic due to lack of a simulator.

[Bug rtl-optimization/47612] RTL crash when cc0 setter moved away from cc0 user

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47612 --- Comment #10 from Joel Sherrill 2011-04-06 17:52:00 UTC --- (In reply to comment #9) > Any chance you can run the testsuite before/after the patch? m68k is > problematic due to lack of a simulator. I can test with RTEMS on Qemu targeting an m

[Bug rtl-optimization/47612] RTL crash when cc0 setter moved away from cc0 user

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47612 --- Comment #11 from Joel Sherrill 2011-04-07 11:44:54 UTC --- In both cases, I built gcc + newlib multilib + rtems multilib to ensure the entire software base was built with and without the patch. $ m68k-rtems4.11-gcc --version m68k-rtems4.11-g

[Bug rtl-optimization/47612] RTL crash when cc0 setter moved away from cc0 user

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47612 Bernd Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #23890|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug rtl-optimization/47612] RTL crash when cc0 setter moved away from cc0 user

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47612 --- Comment #13 from Joel Sherrill 2011-04-07 15:28:39 UTC --- Not a problem to redo.. just CPU time and if you don't use it, you lose it. :-D I am repeating some information so it is all in one post. In both cases, I built gcc + newlib multilib

[Bug rtl-optimization/47612] RTL crash when cc0 setter moved away from cc0 user

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47612 --- Comment #14 from Bernd Schmidt 2011-04-07 15:35:34 UTC --- >From the test results you posted, it appears to have been +WARNING: program timed out. +FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/fp-int-convert-double.c -O2 -flto execution test Probably unrelated.

[Bug rtl-optimization/47612] RTL crash when cc0 setter moved away from cc0 user

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47612 --- Comment #15 from Joel Sherrill 2011-04-07 15:44:16 UTC --- (In reply to comment #14) > From the test results you posted, it appears to have been > > +WARNING: program timed out. > +FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/fp-int-convert-double.c -O2 -flto exe

[Bug rtl-optimization/47612] RTL crash when cc0 setter moved away from cc0 user

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47612 --- Comment #16 from Bernd Schmidt 2011-05-04 20:24:19 UTC --- Author: bernds Date: Wed May 4 20:24:15 2011 New Revision: 173393 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=173393 Log: PR rtl-optimization/47612 * df-problems.c

[Bug rtl-optimization/47612] RTL crash when cc0 setter moved away from cc0 user

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47612 --- Comment #17 from Vincent Riviere 2011-05-04 23:59:00 UTC --- For me the bug seems to be fixed.

[Bug rtl-optimization/47612] RTL crash when cc0 setter moved away from cc0 user

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47612 --- Comment #18 from Vincent Riviere 2011-08-02 07:30:06 UTC --- I have applied your patch to GCC 4.6.1 and it worked fine on all the software I'm used to compile. You should apply it to the 4.6 branch.