[Bug rtl-optimization/49472] [4.7 regression] Compiler segfault on valid code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49472 --- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-07-04 21:09:28 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Jul 4 21:09:26 2011 New Revision: 175828 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175828 Log: PR rtl-optimization/49472 * simplify-rtx.c

[Bug rtl-optimization/49472] [4.7 regression] Compiler segfault on valid code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49472 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug rtl-optimization/49472] [4.7 regression] Compiler segfault on valid code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49472 --- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-07-04 18:53:58 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Jul 4 18:53:56 2011 New Revision: 175821 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175821 Log: PR rtl-optimization/49472 * simplify-rtx.c

[Bug rtl-optimization/49472] [4.7 regression] Compiler segfault on valid code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49472 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassigned at

[Bug rtl-optimization/49472] [4.7 regression] Compiler segfault on valid code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49472 --- Comment #10 from Eric Botcazou 2011-06-21 08:31:22 UTC --- > --- gcc/simplify-rtx.c.jj2011-06-08 08:53:15.0 +0200 > +++ gcc/simplify-rtx.c2011-06-21 09:46:27.0 +0200 > @@ -686,13 +686,13 @@ simplify_unary_operation_1 (

[Bug rtl-optimization/49472] [4.7 regression] Compiler segfault on valid code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49472 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot |

[Bug rtl-optimization/49472] [4.7 regression] Compiler segfault on valid code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49472 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug rtl-optimization/49472] [4.7 regression] Compiler segfault on valid code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49472 --- Comment #7 from William J. Schmidt 2011-06-20 15:18:55 UTC --- Sorry, paste error. That was the wrong gimple dump. HERE is 142.optimized: ;; Function nu_derivs (__massivenu_MOD_nu_derivs, funcdef_no=0, decl_uid=708, cgraph_uid=0) nu_deriv

[Bug rtl-optimization/49472] [4.7 regression] Compiler segfault on valid code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49472 --- Comment #6 from William J. Schmidt 2011-06-20 15:16:59 UTC --- Gimple out of the middle end looks fine. From 142t.optimized: ;; Function nu_derivs (__massivenu_MOD_nu_derivs, funcdef_no=0, decl_uid=708, cgraph_uid=0) nu_derivs () { real(

[Bug rtl-optimization/49472] [4.7 regression] Compiler segfault on valid code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49472 --- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres 2011-06-20 14:17:51 UTC --- The test in comment #3 compiles if I replace (1._dl+aq*aq)**1.5d0 with sqrt((1._dl+aq*aq)**3).

[Bug rtl-optimization/49472] [4.7 regression] Compiler segfault on valid code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49472 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added CC||wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org --- Co

[Bug rtl-optimization/49472] [4.7 regression] Compiler segfault on valid code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49472 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Co

[Bug rtl-optimization/49472] [4.7 regression] Compiler segfault on valid code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49472 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Component|fortran |rtl-optimization Target Milestone|--