http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51495
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51495
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51495
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51495
--- Comment #3 from stevenb.gcc at gmail dot com stevenb.gcc at gmail dot com
2011-12-12 14:09:12 UTC ---
Untested fix.
Wouldn't that fix make this operation O(E^2)?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51495
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-12
16:36:38 UTC ---
I don't think so. We only do something about single_succ_p basic blocks and
therefore we should never call e.g. that can_duplicate_block_p predicate more
than
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51495
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-12
21:00:39 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Dec 12 21:00:36 2011
New Revision: 182265
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=182265
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51495
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51495
Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
