[Bug rtl-optimization/52113] [4.7 regression][lower-subreg.c] ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2123

2012-02-04 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52113 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug rtl-optimization/52113] [4.7 regression][lower-subreg.c] ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2123

2012-02-04 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52113 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-02-04 12:47:58 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Sat Feb 4 12:47:55 2012 New Revision: 183894 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183894 Log: PR rtl-optimization/52113 * lower-subreg.c

[Bug rtl-optimization/52113] [4.7 regression][lower-subreg.c] ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2123

2012-02-03 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52113 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-02-04 07:39:14 UTC --- Then it should be just a gcc.c-torture/compile/ test instead.

[Bug rtl-optimization/52113] [4.7 regression][lower-subreg.c] ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2123

2012-02-03 Thread gjl at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52113 --- Comment #3 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-02-04 01:14:53 UTC --- Thanks. For the testcase, omit -mmcu=. That option is set by board.exp during testsuite: -/* { dg-options "-O1" } */ +/* { dg-options "-O1 -mmcu=atmega64" } */

[Bug rtl-optimization/52113] [4.7 regression][lower-subreg.c] ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2123

2012-02-03 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52113 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassigned at

[Bug rtl-optimization/52113] [4.7 regression][lower-subreg.c] ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2123

2012-02-03 Thread gjl at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52113 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Target||avr Status|UNCONFIRMED