https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52203
Andrey Belevantsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52203
--- Comment #12 from Zdenek Sojka ---
4.7 is not maintained anymore, can this be closed?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52203
--- Comment #11 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-13
09:36:46 UTC ---
Author: abel
Date: Fri Apr 13 09:36:42 2012
New Revision: 186410
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=186410
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52203
--- Comment #9 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-07
12:00:42 UTC ---
Author: abel
Date: Wed Mar 7 12:00:37 2012
New Revision: 185036
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=185036
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52203
Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.8.0
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52203
--- Comment #2 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-13
08:48:35 UTC ---
Well, in this case the insn is vcvtps2pd (from avx_cvtps2pd256 and
*avx_cvtps2pd256_2 patterns) but not having a reservation looks correct as the
manual
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52203
Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ubizjak at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52203
--- Comment #4 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2012-02-13 15:54:28
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
Well, in this case the insn is vcvtps2pd (from avx_cvtps2pd256 and
*avx_cvtps2pd256_2 patterns) but not having a reservation looks
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52203
--- Comment #5 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2012-02-13 16:00:27
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
The bugs you are referring to were real bugs, where wrong or missing operand
was accessed from attribute calculation machinery.
...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52203
--- Comment #6 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2012-02-13 16:01:40
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
(In reply to comment #4)
The bugs you are referring to were real bugs, where wrong or missing operand
was accessed from attribute
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52203
Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||steven at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52203
--- Comment #8 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-14
06:56:10 UTC ---
Sorry, I didn't explain clearly from the start. Regarding the backend, I just
wanted to double check that for the given insn not having a reservation is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52203
Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52203
Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
14 matches
Mail list logo