http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54016
Andreas Krebbel changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--- Comment #6 from An
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54016
Andreas Krebbel changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54016
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54016
Andreas Krebbel changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54016
--- Comment #3 from rguenther at suse dot de
2012-07-20 14:00:23 UTC ---
On Fri, 20 Jul 2012, krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54016
>
> --- Comment #2 from Andreas Krebbel 2012-07-20
> 13:48:57
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54016
--- Comment #2 from Andreas Krebbel 2012-07-20
13:48:57 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
Do I have to do something special now when creating a loop on RTL level?
Perhaps tell the framework that the loop infos needs to be refreshed or
something li
