http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54645
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ubizjak at gmail dot com
--- Comm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54645
Dehao Chen changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dehao at google dot com
--- Commen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54645
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hp at gcc dot gnu.org
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54645
--- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres 2012-09-20
21:46:10 UTC ---
See http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-09/msg01441.html for the typical
failures of libgomp.fortran.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54645
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54645
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dehao at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54645
--- Comment #1 from Bernd Schmidt 2012-09-20
19:19:05 UTC ---
gcc.dg/pch and g++.dg/pch just completed here without problems. I don't see how
a scheduler patch could cause primarily PCH failures. Can you check your
bisection, and can you r
