http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54739
--- Comment #12 from eager at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-05 17:27:10 UTC ---
Author: eager
Date: Wed Dec 5 17:27:05 2012
New Revision: 194226
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=194226
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/54739
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54739
Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54739
--- Comment #11 from Nick Clifton nickc at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-09
09:22:00 UTC ---
Author: nickc
Date: Tue Oct 9 09:21:47 2012
New Revision: 192244
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=192244
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54739
--- Comment #9 from Andreas Schwab schwab at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-06
11:42:18 UTC ---
Author: schwab
Date: Sat Oct 6 11:42:13 2012
New Revision: 192156
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=192156
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54739
Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||eager at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54739
--- Comment #7 from John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-06
00:33:56 UTC ---
Author: danglin
Date: Sat Oct 6 00:33:52 2012
New Revision: 192152
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=192152
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54739
--- Comment #5 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-04
07:58:31 UTC ---
Thanks. The code generated for the testcase is certainly better on the SPARC
if lower-subreg doesn't split the DImode objects (which probably means
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54739
--- Comment #6 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-04
08:15:37 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Thu Oct 4 08:15:11 2012
New Revision: 192066
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=192066
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54739
--- Comment #3 from Ulrich Weigand uweigand at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-01
12:16:53 UTC ---
It seems all three of those targets have an iordi3 pattern that triggers even
for 32-bit compiles. In this case, the lower-subreg pass now no longer
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54739
--- Comment #4 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-10-01 23:51:23 UTC ---
Thanks Ulrich for your analysis. On parisc, I believe it would be
best to remove
iordi3, anddi3, etc, for 32-bit targets if they are successfully
split.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54739
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|m68k-*-*|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54739
John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
12 matches
Mail list logo
