[Bug rtl-optimization/55845] 454.calculix miscompares with -march=btver2 -O3 -ffastmath -fschedule-insns -mvzeroupper for test data run

2013-01-04 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55845 Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug rtl-optimization/55845] 454.calculix miscompares with -march=btver2 -O3 -ffastmath -fschedule-insns -mvzeroupper for test data run

2013-01-04 Thread venkataramanan.kumar at amd dot com
the .jump2 pass? Regards, Venkat. -Original Message- From: ubizjak at gmail dot com [mailto:gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org] Sent: Friday, January 04, 2013 1:43 PM To: Kumar, Venkataramanan Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/55845] 454.calculix miscompares with -march=btver2 -O3 -ffastmath

[Bug rtl-optimization/55845] 454.calculix miscompares with -march=btver2 -O3 -ffastmath -fschedule-insns -mvzeroupper for test data run

2013-01-04 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55845 --- Comment #6 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2013-01-04 09:20:16 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) I suspected this is a problem with jump optimization. Uros what flag we need to pass to bypass the .jump2 pass? The pass

[Bug rtl-optimization/55845] 454.calculix miscompares with -march=btver2 -O3 -ffastmath -fschedule-insns -mvzeroupper for test data run

2013-01-04 Thread venkataramanan.kumar at amd dot com
. -Original Message- From: ubizjak at gmail dot com [mailto:gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org] Sent: Friday, January 04, 2013 2:50 PM To: Kumar, Venkataramanan Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/55845] 454.calculix miscompares with -march=btver2 -O3 -ffastmath -fschedule-insns -mvzeroupper

[Bug rtl-optimization/55845] 454.calculix miscompares with -march=btver2 -O3 -ffastmath -fschedule-insns -mvzeroupper for test data run

2013-01-03 Thread vbyakovl23 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55845 --- Comment #3 from Vladimir Yakovlev vbyakovl23 at gmail dot com 2013-01-04 06:40:44 UTC --- The test fails corei7-avx also. I build a simple reproducer. - #include stdio.h

[Bug rtl-optimization/55845] 454.calculix miscompares with -march=btver2 -O3 -ffastmath -fschedule-insns -mvzeroupper for test data run

2013-01-02 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55845 Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vbyakovl23

[Bug rtl-optimization/55845] 454.calculix miscompares with -march=btver2 -O3 -ffastmath -fschedule-insns -mvzeroupper for test data run

2013-01-02 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55845 --- Comment #2 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2013-01-02 10:15:16 UTC --- It looks to me that scheduler is doing something with unspec_volatile instructions, since vzeroupper insertion will be cancelled if there are live