https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57130
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||yahemore at gmail dot com
--- Comment #7
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57130
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57130
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-05-02
10:49:08 UTC ---
Created attachment 29996
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29996
gcc49-pr57130.patch
Alternative to the #c3 patch, using SET instead of COMPARE only when ne
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57130
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-05-02
09:23:22 UTC ---
Created attachment 29995
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29995
simplify-truncate.patch
Another thing, it is weird we don't simplify that subreg much earli
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57130
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unas
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57130
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-05-02
06:58:38 UTC ---
Slightly more reduced testcase:
struct S { int a, b, c, d; } s[2] = { { 6, 8, -8, -5 }, { 0, 2, -1, 2 } };
__attribute__((noinline, noclone)) void
foo (struct S r)
{
stat
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57130
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
