https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60818
--- Comment #8 from Arseny Solokha ---
Segher, could you, please, finally decide on the future of the patch?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60818
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.0
--- Comment #9 from Segher Boes
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60818
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60818
--- Comment #7 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Not a regression, postponed to GCC 7, last patch is at
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-02/msg01303.html .
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60818
--- Comment #29 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Is there anything left to do here? Or can this PR be closed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60818
--- Comment #30 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ---
(In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #29)
> Is there anything left to do here? Or can this PR be closed.
As both LibreOffice and GHC now build without issues on Debian powerpcspe with
g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60818
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60818
--- Comment #28 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Tue Jun 27 17:11:01 2017
New Revision: 249700
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249700&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backports from trunk:
2016-08-15 Segher Boessenko
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60818
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|7.2 |7.3
--- Comment #29 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60818
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|7.2 |7.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60818
--- Comment #14 from Segher Boessenkool ---
I cannot get any of the testcases to fail with current trunk (but
they do fail with GCC 6). Combine always merges the compare into
the if_then_else pattern, and there are no such patterns in rs6000
(th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60818
--- Comment #15 from Arseny Solokha ---
(In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #14)
> I cannot get any of the testcases to fail with current trunk (but
> they do fail with GCC 6). Combine always merges the compare into
> the if_then_else p
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60818
--- Comment #16 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ---
Also still reproducible in Debian. LibreOffice just failed to build with the
same problem [1]:
S=/<> && I=$S/instdir && W=$S/workdir && mkdir -p
$W/CxxObject/tools/source/generic/ $W/Dep/CxxObj
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60818
Arseny Solokha changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||7.0
--- Comment #17 from Arseny Solokha
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60818
--- Comment #18 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Okay, this I can reproduce (no -fPIC needed, not even -m32). Thanks!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60818
--- Comment #19 from Alan Modra ---
Yes, r246294 powerpc64le-linux-gcc -O1 -misel ICEs on the last testcase. An
earlier compiler I had laying around, 7.0.0 20160616, does not.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60818
--- Comment #20 from Arseny Solokha ---
(In reply to Alan Modra from comment #19)
> Yes, r246294 powerpc64le-linux-gcc -O1 -misel ICEs on the last testcase. An
> earlier compiler I had laying around, 7.0.0 20160616, does not.
Here's a simplifie
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60818
--- Comment #21 from Segher Boessenkool ---
You don't even need -Os for this last testcase, only -misel.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60818
--- Comment #22 from Segher Boessenkool ---
The combination that makes it die is:
Trying 18, 17 -> 19:
Successfully matched this instruction:
(set (reg:CC 176)
(reg:CC 164))
Where insn 18 is
(set (reg:SI 174)
(gt:SI (reg:CC 164)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60818
--- Comment #23 from Segher Boessenkool ---
I have a patch for the problem in comments 17 and 19 (which is different from
the problems in earlier comments, only some of which i can reproduce).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60818
--- Comment #24 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Tue Apr 4 00:10:02 2017
New Revision: 24
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=24&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
simplify-rtx: Fix compare of comparisons (PR60818)
The function si
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60818
--- Comment #25 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ---
Hi Segher!
Your patch fixes the issue for me. I had issues building ghc on powerpcspe.
With gcc-6 it failed in the expected way, with gcc-7, it went past the
problematic source code file.
Would
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60818
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|7.0 |7.2
--- Comment #26 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60818
--- Comment #27 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #26)
> GCC 7.1 has been released.
At least for me, the bug has been fixed with Segher's patch, so I'm not sure if
pushing the milestone to 7.2 makes sense
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60818
--- Comment #10 from Arseny Solokha ---
Segher, can you update on the status of this PR, as the stage 1 apparently
approaches to its end?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60818
--- Comment #11 from Segher Boessenkool ---
It's on my radar. All bugs can be fixed during stage3.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60818
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||glaubitz at physik dot
fu-be
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60818
--- Comment #13 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ---
Created attachment 39807
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39807&action=edit
Pre-processed source for tools/qtextboundaryfinder.cpp
28 matches
Mail list logo
