https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62030
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62030
--- Comment #10 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vries
Date: Sat Aug 16 17:38:04 2014
New Revision: 214067
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214067root=gccview=rev
Log:
Fix if-conversion pass for dead type-unsafe code
2014-08-15
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62030
--- Comment #9 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vries
Date: Fri Aug 15 21:23:21 2014
New Revision: 214044
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214044root=gccview=rev
Log:
Fix if-conversion pass for dead type-unsafe code
2014-08-15 Tom
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62030
--- Comment #7 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vries
Date: Thu Aug 14 16:13:59 2014
New Revision: 213970
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=213970root=gccview=rev
Log:
Fix if-conversion pass for dead type-unsafe code
2014-08-14 Tom
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62030
--- Comment #8 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vries
Revision: 213970
Modified property: svn:log
Modified: svn:log at Thu Aug 14 17:48:43 2014
--
--- svn:log
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62030
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62030
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62030
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vries at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62030
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to vries from comment #2)
I think the test-case is reading an undefined value from n-next, but that's
easy enough to fix with an intializer for node.
Since node is a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62030
--- Comment #4 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3)
(In reply to vries from comment #2)
I think the test-case is reading an undefined value from n-next, but that's
easy enough to fix with an
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62030
--- Comment #5 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 33258
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33258action=edit
Updated tentative patch for if-conversion, including fix for pr62030
Updated tentative patch for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62030
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Here are the two stores:
(insn 30 25 33 3 (set (mem/f:DI (reg/v/f:DI 200 [ prev ]) [5 MEM[(struct head
*)heads][_8].first+0 S8 A64])
(reg/v/f:DI 199 [ next ])) t.c:22 302
12 matches
Mail list logo
