https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65078
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65078
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Seems this has started with r216247, and indeed, compiling the testcase with
-std=gnu89 even with latest trunk results in those 25 %esp references, while
using -std=gnu11 even with r19 results in 69 %esp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65078
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #3)
> Similar to PR21182 ?
>
> As suggested in the above PR, does "-fschedule-insns -fsched-pressure" make
> any difference?
No.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65078
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ra
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65078
--- Comment #3 from Uroš Bizjak ---
Similar to PR21182 ?
As suggested in the above PR, does "-fschedule-insns -fsched-pressure" make any
difference?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65078
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65078
--- Comment #1 from Yuri Rumyantsev ---
Created attachment 34782
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34782&action=edit
test-case to reproduce
Options -m32 -msse2 -O3 must be used.
