https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65371
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65371
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||terrygreeniaus at gmail dot com
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65371
--- Comment #4 from Stuart ---
The assembly generated from Comment #1 looks good.
However, the assembly generated from Comment #3 hasn't improved, it still
contains the unnecessary mov instruction on line 2 (mov r2, r3).
The first instruction m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65371
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65371
--- Comment #2 from Stuart ---
I compiled it for x86_64 and thought it was fine, however, after your comment I
tried compiling it with clang/llvm and can see the difference (I'm not
particularly familiar with the full instruction set)...
I've fo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65371
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|target |rtl-optimization
--- Comment #1 from Ri
