https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85805
--- Comment #10 from Segher Boessenkool ---
It is fixed for 9 yes, and I am still pondering it for 8. I guess that's
not going to happen.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85805
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #9
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85805
--- Comment #8 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Thu Jul 26 10:16:48 2018
New Revision: 262994
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262994&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
combine: Another hard register problem (PR85805)
The current code i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85805
--- Comment #7 from Segher Boessenkool ---
I suspect this is because we have hard regs here, not pseudos. Not a good
idea in general, which is why other targets don't do this.
Perhaps it is a mode mixup in the known value tracking?
Confirmed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85805
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
CC|
