https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94516
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94516
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|10.4|10.5
--- Comment #21 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94516
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|10.3|10.4
--- Comment #20 from Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94516
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|10.2|10.3
--- Comment #19 from Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94516
--- Comment #18 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:af1634f1b555004753a22d1124dbb8419ee095cb
commit r11-192-gaf1634f1b555004753a22d1124dbb8419ee095cb
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: Fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94516
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|10.0|10.2
--- Comment #17 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94516
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[10/11 Regression] gnutls |[10 Regression] gnutls test
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94516
--- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 48312
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48312&action=edit
gcc10-pr94516.patch
Untested patch for the missed-optimization part, with this we get the same
assembly like g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94516
--- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek ---
I've gathered statistics across x86_64-linux and i686-linux bootstraps/regtests
in postreload.c (reload_cse_simplify_set) when sp = sp + const_int is replaced
with sp = reg, once with the recent cselib.c/var
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94516
--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Wonder if we couldn't let postreload.c add REG_EQUAL notes when it replaces sp
+= CONST_INT with sp = reg, like:
--- gcc/postreload.c.jj 2020-04-08 12:03:54.600398023 +0200
+++ gcc/postreload.c2020-04-09
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94516
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P1 |P2
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94516
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek ---
The wrong-code issue is now fixed, keeping open for the missed-optimization
part.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94516
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:70b55b25aa14b60f0e0f0193f7178bae756076ad
commit r10-7617-g70b55b25aa14b60f0e0f0193f7178bae756076ad
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94516
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
For the optimization issue, we could have a hack like:
--- gcc/postreload.c.jj 2020-04-07 16:54:23.638924247 +0200
+++ gcc/postreload.c2020-04-07 17:06:44.055964581 +0200
@@ -328,6 +328,17 @@ reload_cse_s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94516
--- Comment #8 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #7)
> Created attachment 48231 [details]
> gcc10-pr94516.patch
>
> Sure, here it is with a testcase.
Great job!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94516
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #48230|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94516
--- Comment #6 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #5)
> Created attachment 48230 [details]
> gcc10-pr94516.patch
>
I can confirm the patch fixes the gnutls. Would you be able to come up with a
test-case?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94516
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94516
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94516
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94516
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-04-07
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94516
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94516
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
Created attachment 48228
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48228&action=edit
pre-processed source file
It's compiled with:
$ gcc -fdiagnostics-show-option -O2 -Wall -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2
-f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94516
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška ---
Created attachment 48227
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48227&action=edit
Reducing patch for psk-file.c
I tried both ASAN and UBSAN, and also valgrind with -O0 and it seems all fine.
24 matches
Mail list logo