[Bug rtl-optimization/96264] [10/11 Regression] wrong code with -Os -fno-forward-propagate -fschedule-insns -fno-tree-ter

2021-02-19 Thread seurer at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96264 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED

[Bug rtl-optimization/96264] [10/11 Regression] wrong code with -Os -fno-forward-propagate -fschedule-insns -fno-tree-ter

2021-02-19 Thread bergner at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96264 Peter Bergner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/96264] [10/11 Regression] wrong code with -Os -fno-forward-propagate -fschedule-insns -fno-tree-ter

2021-02-19 Thread seurer at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96264 --- Comment #13 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Thanks, that did fix it on trunk.

[Bug rtl-optimization/96264] [10/11 Regression] wrong code with -Os -fno-forward-propagate -fschedule-insns -fno-tree-ter

2021-02-18 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96264 --- Comment #12 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Vladimir Makarov : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d1efec57e279f5b0cd62073696cd351fce369bb7 commit r11-7285-gd1efec57e279f5b0cd62073696cd351fce369bb7 Author: Vladimir N. Makarov

[Bug rtl-optimization/96264] [10/11 Regression] wrong code with -Os -fno-forward-propagate -fschedule-insns -fno-tree-ter

2021-02-17 Thread vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96264 --- Comment #11 from Vladimir Makarov --- I've reproduced this bug and started to work on it. The bug is serious and should be probably considered as P1 one. I try to fix it on this week.

[Bug rtl-optimization/96264] [10/11 Regression] wrong code with -Os -fno-forward-propagate -fschedule-insns -fno-tree-ter

2021-02-11 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96264 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ra CC|

[Bug rtl-optimization/96264] [10/11 Regression] wrong code with -Os -fno-forward-propagate -fschedule-insns -fno-tree-ter

2021-02-11 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96264 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek --- So, using the r10-135 compiler, seems things go wrong during RA. In *.ira, we have: (insn 35 34 217 2 (parallel [ (set (reg:DI 544 [ _29 ]) (minus:DI (reg:DI 542 [ _26 ])

[Bug rtl-optimization/96264] [10/11 Regression] wrong code with -Os -fno-forward-propagate -fschedule-insns -fno-tree-ter

2021-02-11 Thread seurer at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96264 --- Comment #8 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Enabling -fno-forward-propagate triggers the problem. seurer@genoa:~/gcc/git/build/gcc-10-test$ whichgcc Now at commit g:a7eb97ad269b6509bd7b31ca373daea98e4d7e85, r10-135

[Bug rtl-optimization/96264] [10/11 Regression] wrong code with -Os -fno-forward-propagate -fschedule-insns -fno-tree-ter

2021-02-11 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96264 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #7

[Bug rtl-optimization/96264] [10/11 Regression] wrong code with -Os -fno-forward-propagate -fschedule-insns -fno-tree-ter

2021-02-11 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96264 --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to seurer from comment #5) > I too am able to duplicate this on a native powerpc64 LE machine. Changing > any of the compilation options (-Os -fno-forward-propagate -fschedule-insns >

[Bug rtl-optimization/96264] [10/11 Regression] wrong code with -Os -fno-forward-propagate -fschedule-insns -fno-tree-ter

2021-02-11 Thread seurer at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96264 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Host|x86_64-pc-linux-gnu |x86_64-pc-linux-gnu,

[Bug rtl-optimization/96264] [10/11 Regression] wrong code with -Os -fno-forward-propagate -fschedule-insns -fno-tree-ter

2021-02-11 Thread seurer at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96264 --- Comment #4 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 50168 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50168=edit Assembler output from broken revision

[Bug rtl-optimization/96264] [10/11 Regression] wrong code with -Os -fno-forward-propagate -fschedule-insns -fno-tree-ter

2021-02-11 Thread seurer at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96264 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||seurer at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug rtl-optimization/96264] [10/11 Regression] wrong code with -Os -fno-forward-propagate -fschedule-insns -fno-tree-ter

2020-10-12 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96264 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug rtl-optimization/96264] [10/11 Regression] wrong code with -Os -fno-forward-propagate -fschedule-insns -fno-tree-ter

2020-07-23 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96264 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug rtl-optimization/96264] [10/11 Regression] wrong code with -Os -fno-forward-propagate -fschedule-insns -fno-tree-ter

2020-07-23 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96264 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|10.2|10.3 --- Comment #1 from Richard

[Bug rtl-optimization/96264] [10/11 Regression] wrong code with -Os -fno-forward-propagate -fschedule-insns -fno-tree-ter

2020-07-21 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96264 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |10.2