https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98425
--- Comment #5 from Nicolas Koenig ---
The advantage of using mov over movs for known-positive integers would be that
32bit moves are also move-eliminated, while movs always has to be executed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98425
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98425
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Yes, it has been reported to LLVM years ago that they violate the psABI, but
they refused to fix that.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98425
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Note your optimum code is wrong.
movl %esi, %eax
Is a zero extend.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98425
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ABI
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski -
