https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113553
--- Comment #14 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ---
The posix_spawn() issue on sparc64 is explained in more detail, including a
reproducer, here:
https://lore.kernel.org/sparclinux/3ae4130c-c5aa-428e-b819-44cf2daf2...@mkarcher.dialup.fu-berlin.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113553
--- Comment #13 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Bruno Haible from comment #12)
> For reference: The Gnulib unit tests for posix_spawn* pass on
> sparc-linux-gnu (both in 32-bit mode and in 64-bit mode).
But the issue sounds very intermitten
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113553
Bruno Haible changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bruno at clisp dot org
--- Comment #12 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113553
--- Comment #11 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to John Paul Adrian Glaubitz from comment #10)
> (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #9)
> > oh look at this a memset issue on sparc glibc:
> > https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113553
--- Comment #10 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #9)
> oh look at this a memset issue on sparc glibc:
> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31068 .
Hmm, but this would be sparc32. Are you su
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113553
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://sourceware.org/bugz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113553
--- Comment #8 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #6)
> Let me look that seems like an unitialized variable. If it is obvious one, I
> will apply a patch.
Thanks. I was actually researching the above erro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113553
--- Comment #7 from Sam James ---
(In reply to Sam James from comment #4)
(sorry, I misread Rainer's comment - he was talking about glibc too.)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113553
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to John Paul Adrian Glaubitz from comment #5)
> (In reply to Rainer Orth from comment #1)
> > The build works for me just fine on sparc-sun-solaris2.11.
> >
> > I've also fired one off on sparc64-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113553
--- Comment #5 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ---
(In reply to Rainer Orth from comment #1)
> The build works for me just fine on sparc-sun-solaris2.11.
>
> I've also fired one off on sparc64-unknown-linux-gnu which worked just as
> well.
> It
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113553
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113553
--- Comment #3 from Matthias Klose ---
glibc 2.37 from the branch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113553
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Which glibc are you using?
See https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82346 and maybe
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22146
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113553
--- Comment #1 from Rainer Orth ---
The build works for me just fine on sparc-sun-solaris2.11.
I've also fired one off on sparc64-unknown-linux-gnu which worked just as well.
It was a rough ride, however, with the build aborting with
xgcc: fat
14 matches
Mail list logo