[Bug sanitizer/103466] [12 Regression] SIGILL on machine without avx support when using thread sanitizer

2021-12-09 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103466 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug sanitizer/103466] [12 Regression] SIGILL on machine without avx support when using thread sanitizer

2021-12-06 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103466 --- Comment #8 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:70b043845d7c378c6a9361a6769885897d1018c2 commit r12-5806-g70b043845d7c378c6a9361a6769885897d1018c2 Author: H.J. Lu Date: Tue Nov 30

[Bug sanitizer/103466] [12 Regression] SIGILL on machine without avx support when using thread sanitizer

2021-12-06 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103466 --- Comment #7 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #6) > I'd say we should patch away locally the initial v prefixes until the merge > is done. The patch is here:

[Bug sanitizer/103466] [12 Regression] SIGILL on machine without avx support when using thread sanitizer

2021-12-06 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103466 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- I'd say we should patch away locally the initial v prefixes until the merge is done.

[Bug sanitizer/103466] [12 Regression] SIGILL on machine without avx support when using thread sanitizer

2021-11-30 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103466 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |marxin at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug sanitizer/103466] [12 Regression] SIGILL on machine without avx support when using thread sanitizer

2021-11-29 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103466 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Version|unknown

[Bug sanitizer/103466] [12 Regression] SIGILL on machine without avx support when using thread sanitizer

2021-11-29 Thread dvyukov at google dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103466 Dmitry Vyukov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dvyukov at google dot com --- Comment

[Bug sanitizer/103466] [12 Regression] SIGILL on machine without avx support when using thread sanitizer

2021-11-29 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103466 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- https://reviews.llvm.org/D113742

[Bug sanitizer/103466] [12 Regression] SIGILL on machine without avx support when using thread sanitizer

2021-11-29 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103466 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > I don't see this section in the upstream sources: > + # All XMM registers are caller-saved. Or maybe I am looking at the wrong branch

[Bug sanitizer/103466] [12 Regression] SIGILL on machine without avx support when using thread sanitizer

2021-11-29 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103466 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[12 Regression] SIGILL on |[12 Regression] SIGILL on