[Bug sanitizer/60142] [4.9 Regression][asan] -fsanitize=address breaks debugging - stepping into functions no longer possible

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60142 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug sanitizer/60142] [4.9 Regression][asan] -fsanitize=address breaks debugging - stepping into functions no longer possible

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60142 --- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Feb 18 21:16:21 2014 New Revision: 207853 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=207853&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR sanitizer/60142 * final.c (SEEN_BB): Remove. (SEEN_NOTE, SEE

[Bug sanitizer/60142] [4.9 Regression][asan] -fsanitize=address breaks debugging - stepping into functions no longer possible

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60142 --- Comment #9 from Jan Kratochvil --- Confirming x86_64-linux testsuite on gdb-7.7.50.20140218-cvs has no changes/regressions. (Also confirming it fixes for me the Comment 0 gcc4.9 regression.)

[Bug sanitizer/60142] [4.9 Regression][asan] -fsanitize=address breaks debugging - stepping into functions no longer possible

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60142 --- Comment #8 from Jan Kratochvil --- Typo above, the real GDB commit of the XMM registers init workaround was: https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commitdiff;h=08711b9a36344df9e29be436d9f959324fff4f42 (In reply to Jakub Jelinek fr

[Bug sanitizer/60142] [4.9 Regression][asan] -fsanitize=address breaks debugging - stepping into functions no longer possible

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60142 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||drow at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug sanitizer/60142] [4.9 Regression][asan] -fsanitize=address breaks debugging - stepping into functions no longer possible

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60142 --- Comment #6 from Jan Kratochvil --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #5) > as in the case of the varargs x86_64 function that might need > saving xmm registers, [...] > So, does GDB have a > disassemble matcher for the ... prologue, or d

[Bug sanitizer/60142] [4.9 Regression][asan] -fsanitize=address breaks debugging - stepping into functions no longer possible

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60142 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- BTW, the second line change in the function heuristics also fails for say: #include void bar (va_list ap); void foo (int a, ...) { va_list ap; va_start (ap, a); bar (ap); va_end (ap); } on x86_64,

[Bug sanitizer/60142] [4.9 Regression][asan] -fsanitize=address breaks debugging - stepping into functions no longer possible

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60142 Jan Kratochvil changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jan.kratochvil at redhat dot com --- Co

[Bug sanitizer/60142] [4.9 Regression][asan] -fsanitize=address breaks debugging - stepping into functions no longer possible

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60142 --- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2) > Works also with [...] or -O0 -fsanitize=address -g > --param asan-use-after-return=0. For what it is worth and with that comment rather unsurprisingly, the commit

[Bug sanitizer/60142] [4.9 Regression][asan] -fsanitize=address breaks debugging - stepping into functions no longer possible

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60142 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jkratoch at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug sanitizer/60142] [4.9 Regression][asan] -fsanitize=address breaks debugging - stepping into functions no longer possible

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60142 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-debug Target Milestone|---