[Bug sanitizer/65479] sanitizer stack trace missing frames past #0 on powerpc64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65479 Peter Bergner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED --- Comment #25 from Peter

[Bug sanitizer/65479] sanitizer stack trace missing frames past #0 on powerpc64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65479 --- Comment #24 from Peter Bergner --- Closing as fixed.

[Bug sanitizer/65479] sanitizer stack trace missing frames past #0 on powerpc64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65479 Peter Bergner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug sanitizer/65479] sanitizer stack trace missing frames past #0 on powerpc64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65479 --- Comment #22 from Bill Seurer --- This is now resolved in gcc 5, 6, and trunk

[Bug sanitizer/65479] sanitizer stack trace missing frames past #0 on powerpc64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65479 --- Comment #21 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: seurer Date: Tue Jan 10 19:11:55 2017 New Revision: 244284 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244284=gcc=rev Log: 2017-01-10 Bill Seurer Backport

[Bug sanitizer/65479] sanitizer stack trace missing frames past #0 on powerpc64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65479 --- Comment #20 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: seurer Date: Mon Jan 9 20:45:59 2017 New Revision: 244241 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244241=gcc=rev Log: 2017-01-09 Bill Seurer Backport

[Bug sanitizer/65479] sanitizer stack trace missing frames past #0 on powerpc64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65479 --- Comment #19 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: seurer Date: Wed Dec 21 19:09:10 2016 New Revision: 243863 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243863=gcc=rev Log: [PATCH, v2, rs6000] pr65479 Add -fasynchronous-unwind-tables when the

[Bug sanitizer/65479] sanitizer stack trace missing frames past #0 on powerpc64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65479 Bill Seurer changed: What|Removed |Added CC||seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com ---

[Bug sanitizer/65479] sanitizer stack trace missing frames past #0 on powerpc64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65479 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|msebor at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug sanitizer/65479] sanitizer stack trace missing frames past #0 on powerpc64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65479 Bill Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug sanitizer/65479] sanitizer stack trace missing frames past #0 on powerpc64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65479 --- Comment #15 from Bill Schmidt --- Yes, it seems likely that this is due to this patch being missing from GCC 5.3: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11552 The fix is present in trunk, so this should be fixed with a backport.

[Bug sanitizer/65479] sanitizer stack trace missing frames past #0 on powerpc64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65479 --- Comment #14 from Bill Schmidt --- I wonder if this is just support that hasn't been updated in the GCC copy of libsanitizer. I recall fixing this bug (or one very similar to it) on the Clang side in 2015. There is some Power-specific logic

[Bug sanitizer/65479] sanitizer stack trace missing frames past #0 on powerpc64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65479 Joakim Tjernlund changed: What|Removed |Added CC||joakim.tjernlund at infinera dot c

[Bug sanitizer/65479] sanitizer stack trace missing frames past #0 on powerpc64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65479 --- Comment #12 from Martin Sebor --- The sanitizer tests are still failing and this bug still hasn't been fixed. The patch in r224402 was only partial, committed on the assumption that the LLVM AddressSantitizer maintainers would approve my

[Bug sanitizer/65479] sanitizer stack trace missing frames past #0 on powerpc64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65479 Bill Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Target||powerpc64*-*-linux* CC|

[Bug sanitizer/65479] sanitizer stack trace missing frames past #0 on powerpc64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65479 --- Comment #10 from Martin Sebor msebor at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: msebor Date: Fri Jun 12 00:01:50 2015 New Revision: 224402 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224402root=gccview=rev Log: 2015-06-11 Martin Sebor mse...@redhat.com

[Bug sanitizer/65479] sanitizer stack trace missing frames past #0 on powerpc64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65479 Martin Sebor msebor at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #35196|0 |1 is

[Bug sanitizer/65479] sanitizer stack trace missing frames past #0 on powerpc64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65479 --- Comment #8 from Martin Sebor msebor at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 35308 -- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35308action=edit Patch tested on powerp64*-*-* This patch lets the affected tests pass on powerp64*-*-*

[Bug sanitizer/65479] sanitizer stack trace missing frames past #0 on powerpc64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65479 Martin Sebor msebor at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||65749 ---

[Bug sanitizer/65479] sanitizer stack trace missing frames past #0 on powerpc64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65479 --- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor msebor at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 35196 -- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35196action=edit Proof-of-concept patch. Two problems are contributing to the failures in these tests:

[Bug sanitizer/65479] sanitizer stack trace missing frames past #0 on powerpc64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65479 --- Comment #1 from Martin Sebor msebor at gcc dot gnu.org --- The same problem is causing failures in the following tests on these targets: c-c++-common/asan/misalign-2.c c-c++-common/asan/null-deref-1.c