[Bug target/100009] [9 Regression] -march=native doesn't work on tigerlake

2021-04-30 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug target/100009] [9 Regression] -march=native doesn't work on tigerlake

2021-04-15 Thread crazylht at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19 --- Comment #5 from Hongtao.liu --- (In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #3) > > Response from Jim Wilson: > > Looks like a bug in gcc-9. tigerlake was added to > > gcc/config/i386/driver-i386.c but not to the arch_names_table in i386.c. I

[Bug target/100009] [9 Regression] -march=native doesn't work on tigerlake

2021-04-12 Thread crazylht at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19 --- Comment #4 from Hongtao.liu --- > Oops, > will backport r10-2664-ga9fcfec30f70c30883f53d4b1bd533fbea0e9fb2 (tigerlake > part) to gcc9. PTA_AVX512VP2INTERSECT is enabled in GCC10, don't plan to backport to gcc9, so in GCC9 -march=native

[Bug target/100009] [9 Regression] -march=native doesn't work on tigerlake

2021-04-12 Thread crazylht at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19 Hongtao.liu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||crazylht at gmail dot com --- Comment #3

[Bug target/100009] [9 Regression] -march=native doesn't work on tigerlake

2021-04-12 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Target Milestone|---