https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100711
--- Comment #15 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jan Beulich :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e007369c8b67bcabd57c4fed8cff2a6db82e78e6
commit r14-2314-ge007369c8b67bcabd57c4fed8cff2a6db82e78e6
Author: Jan Beulich
Date: Wed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100711
--- Comment #14 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jan Beulich :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fa58c2871a1235cb5ba475303a2bd11ae90416d5
commit r14-2313-gfa58c2871a1235cb5ba475303a2bd11ae90416d5
Author: Jan Beulich
Date: Wed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100711
--- Comment #13 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jan Beulich :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3186ef0cb9e2d25e8455f9990e50187e3d1eee19
commit r14-2312-g3186ef0cb9e2d25e8455f9990e50187e3d1eee19
Author: Jan Beulich
Date: Wed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100711
--- Comment #12 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by hongtao Liu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ed6a9a35799c9298321d1589533767c2bb6f8d42
commit r14-1307-ged6a9a35799c9298321d1589533767c2bb6f8d42
Author: liuhongt
Date: Thu May
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100711
--- Comment #11 from Hongtao.liu ---
(In reply to jbeulich from comment #10)
> (In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #9)
> > We don't have single instruction for V8HI/V16QImode broadcast without AVX2,
> > that's why the first splitter only have
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100711
--- Comment #10 from jbeulich at suse dot com ---
(In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #9)
> We don't have single instruction for V8HI/V16QImode broadcast without AVX2,
> that's why the first splitter only have VI48_128.
Does this matter? The s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100711
--- Comment #9 from Hongtao.liu ---
(In reply to jbeulich from comment #8)
> Since the commit doesn't really explain it (maybe it's obvious to others,
> but it isn't to me), may I ask why two splitters were introduced, yet then
> still not cover
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100711
jbeulich at suse dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jbeulich at suse dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100711
Hongtao.liu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100711
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Roger Sayle :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c39d77f252e895306ef88c1efb3eff04e4232554
commit r12-5595-gc39d77f252e895306ef88c1efb3eff04e4232554
Author: Roger Sayle
Date: Tue N
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100711
--- Comment #5 from Segher Boessenkool ---
(In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #4)
> > Even w/ canonical RTL, i think a combine splitter is also needed here, the
> > canonical RTL only helps combine/forwprop to match more possibility but
> > w
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100711
--- Comment #4 from Hongtao.liu ---
(In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #3)
>
> (In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #2)
> > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> > > I suppose we're confused about the vec_duplicate. Would g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100711
--- Comment #3 from Hongtao.liu ---
(In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #2)
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> > I suppose we're confused about the vec_duplicate. Would generally swapping
> > the duplicate and the bit_n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100711
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100711
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
15 matches
Mail list logo
