https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101929
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101929
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
diff --git a/gcc/tree-vect-slp.cc b/gcc/tree-vect-slp.cc
index 9188d727e33..7f1f12fb6c6 100644
--- a/gcc/tree-vect-slp.cc
+++ b/gcc/tree-vect-slp.cc
@@ -2374,7 +2375,7 @@ fail:
n_vector_buil
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101929
--- Comment #8 from Hongtao.liu ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #7)
> diff --git a/gcc/tree-vect-slp.cc b/gcc/tree-vect-slp.cc
> index 9188d727e33..7f1f12fb6c6 100644
> --- a/gcc/tree-vect-slp.cc
> +++ b/gcc/tree-vect-slp.cc
> @@ -2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101929
--- Comment #9 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Mon, 7 Mar 2022, crazylht at gmail dot com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101929
>
> --- Comment #8 from Hongtao.liu ---
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #7)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101929
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101929
Hongtao.liu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |---
Status|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101929
--- Comment #12 from Hongtao.liu ---
> It's difficult (if not impossible) for the vectorizer to second-guess
> the followup FRE, we're a long way from doing loop + SLP vectorization
> in one go and discover we can elide the vector store.
I'm t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101929
--- Comment #13 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #12)
>
> > It's difficult (if not impossible) for the vectorizer to second-guess
> > the followup FRE, we're a long way from doing loop + SLP vectorization
> > in on
