https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101936
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101936
--- Comment #6 from Hongtao.liu ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #5)
> > https://lnt.opensuse.org/db_default/v4/SPEC/graph?plot.0=32.507.0
> >
>
> Looking at LNT, the benchmark score is not back after the reversion of the
> patch.
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101936
--- Comment #5 from Martin Liška ---
> https://lnt.opensuse.org/db_default/v4/SPEC/graph?plot.0=32.507.0
>
Looking at LNT, the benchmark score is not back after the reversion of the
patch.
Maybe we face now PR101935?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101936
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by hongtao Liu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1db70e61a92978377a648bbd90e383859fc0126b
commit r12-3011-g1db70e61a92978377a648bbd90e383859fc0126b
Author: liuhongt
Date: Tue Aug
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101936
--- Comment #3 from Hongtao.liu ---
(In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #2)
> I'll take a look at why there's the regression and revert my patch.
>
I can't reproduce it on my skylake client, anyway i will revert my patch.
> There's already an
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101936
--- Comment #2 from Hongtao.liu ---
I'll take a look at why there's the regression and revert my patch.
There's already another regression by this commit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101929
