https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10
--- Comment #9 from Sam James ---
Confirmed that the GCC 11 branch backport works here. Thanks all!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Andreas Krebbel
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:22b25535b8b2f9961e4772b1cc7cce5dc2f60719
commit r11-9025-g22b25535b8b2f9961e4772b1cc7cce5dc2f60719
Author: Andreas Krebb
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Andreas Krebbel :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a9b3c451be58f0fe660154323ace7ba72a4211ec
commit r12-3780-ga9b3c451be58f0fe660154323ace7ba72a4211ec
Author: Andreas Krebbel
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10
--- Comment #6 from Andreas Krebbel ---
(insn 9 8 10 2 (set (strict_low_part (reg:SI 66))
(mem/c:SI (plus:SI (reg/f:SI 64)
(const_int 4 [0x4])) [1 read_inode_val+0 S4 A32]))
With -mesa this should be a simple move. Howev
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10
Andreas Krebbel changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |krebbel at gcc dot
gnu.org
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10
--- Comment #3 from Sam James ---
This appears to work fine (cannot reproduce the ICE) with GCC 12 at
1bc66017c118229a101f0a2c097a9c209f777883:
```
$ gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=gcc
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/libexec/gcc/s390-ibm-lin
