--- Additional Comments From uros at kss-loka dot si 2004-12-22 08:02
---
FYI: glibc fix is here:
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/libc-hacker/2004-12/msg00068.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10395
--- Additional Comments From uros at kss-loka dot si 2004-12-21 12:50
---
Fixed pthread library should be installed to solve this bug:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2004-12/msg00918.html
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From uros at kss-loka dot si 2004-12-20 13:16
---
(In reply to comment #21)
The default pthread library in RedHat 8.0 does align stack properly, as I
am
able to trigger the bug. Testcase shows:
Uros, did you mean does *not* align the stack properly?
--- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2004-12-20 15:13
---
An attribute could work. I doubt that a general flag would be useful,
since one in general doesn't know which functions are thread entry
points, so the compiler would have to emit such stack alignment code
--- Additional Comments From uros at kss-loka dot si 2004-12-15 08:32
---
Comment #32 in PR 17990 says:
In response to comment #30: it is libpthread's responsibility to align the
stack of subthreads properly. It doesn't do that, however, but I believe
that we have another PR for that
--- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2004-12-15 14:03
---
The default pthread library in RedHat 8.0 does align stack properly, as I am
able to trigger the bug. Testcase shows:
Uros, did you mean does *not* align the stack properly? If so, I would
say yes, we
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-11 17:09
---
*** Bug 17934 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From terpstra at ito dot tu-darmstadt dot de 2004-10-11
17:21 ---
My bug #17934 was merged with this one.
However, my test case demonstrates the problem WITHOUT threads.
The same issue appears with a single-threaded application of sufficient complexity.
--
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-11 17:26
---
*** Bug 17934 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10395