https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104045
--- Comment #5 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
Folding the fmax operation should be valid in the absence of
-fsignaling-nans (fmax (a, +Inf) should return +Inf without raising any
exceptions, for any x not a signaling NaN). However, r
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104045
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
Note I don't even think llvm implements-ftrapping-math . Still not a gcc bug.
There is a bug request on changing the default already opened for gcc.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104045
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104045
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
I read that wrong. We have
Max. I suspect the issue is gcc has -ftrapping-math turned on by
default while clang does not.
Does -fno-trapping-math fix the issue?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104045
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
I think gcc is correct and clang is wrong. Fmax treats Nan as missing data so
fmax is really just a.
