https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104529
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
When I disable the TREE_READONLY (decl) = true; in build_target_expr, on the
array-temp1.C testcase gimple dump changes:
int f ()
{
int D.2491;
- static const int C.0[10] = {1, 42, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104529
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
>From what I can see, this setting of TREE_READONLY has been added in
r9-869-g5603790dbf233c31c60 aka PR85873 fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104529
--- Comment #7 from Tamar Christina ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #6)
> I don't see the code mentioned in #c0 on x86_64, I see also loads and stores
> like on aarch64.
Yes, that was my mistake, I was accidentally comparing GCC 11
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104529
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-bisection |
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104529
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needs-bisection
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104529
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104529
Tamar Christina changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[missed optimization] |[12 Regression] inefficient
