[Bug target/104713] gcc does not reject -march=i686 -fcf-protection

2022-02-28 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104713 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- Is OLPC really still around? I thought it died when Google came out with their chrome books.

[Bug target/104713] gcc does not reject -march=i686 -fcf-protection

2022-02-28 Thread bunk at stusta dot de via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104713 --- Comment #2 from Adrian Bunk --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > Is OLPC really still around? I thought it died when Google came out with > their chrome books. Sorry for being unclear, this is the historical reason why the binu

[Bug target/104713] gcc does not reject -march=i686 -fcf-protection

2022-02-28 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104713 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug target/104713] gcc does not reject -march=i686 -fcf-protection

2022-02-28 Thread bunk at stusta dot de via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104713 --- Comment #4 from Adrian Bunk --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3) > Just build for those as -march=i586. There is no "for those" in Debian. There is one build of all packages for one i386 Debian release architecture. Building the

[Bug target/104713] gcc does not reject -march=i686 -fcf-protection

2023-03-23 Thread jay+ggcc--- via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104713 --- Comment #8 from James Addison --- (In reply to James Addison from comment #7) > (In reply to Adrian Bunk from comment #6) > > (In reply to James Addison from comment #5) > > > Could the findings indicate that there are two bugs here? > > >

[Bug target/104713] gcc does not reject -march=i686 -fcf-protection

2023-03-24 Thread jay+ggcc--- via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104713 James Addison changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jay+g...@jp-hosting.net --- Comment #9

[Bug target/104713] gcc does not reject -march=i686 -fcf-protection

2023-05-16 Thread jay+ggcc--- via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104713 --- Comment #10 from James Addison --- Hi folks, Re-stating and confirming the bugreport details here: both gcc-11 (11.3.0) and gcc-12 (12.2.0) emit bytecode instructions that aren't supported on all i686-architecture CPUs. This comment includ

[Bug target/104713] gcc does not reject -march=i686 -fcf-protection

2023-03-20 Thread jay+ggcc--- via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104713 James Addison changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jay+g...@jp-hosting.net --- Comment #5

[Bug target/104713] gcc does not reject -march=i686 -fcf-protection

2023-03-20 Thread bunk at stusta dot de via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104713 --- Comment #6 from Adrian Bunk --- (In reply to James Addison from comment #5) > Could the findings indicate that there are two bugs here? > > - The Geode LX target capable of supporting fcf-protection but GCC-11 > currently rejects that arc

[Bug target/104713] gcc does not reject -march=i686 -fcf-protection

2023-03-20 Thread jay+ggcc--- via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104713 --- Comment #7 from James Addison --- (In reply to Adrian Bunk from comment #6) > (In reply to James Addison from comment #5) > > Could the findings indicate that there are two bugs here? > > > > - The Geode LX target capable of supporting fc