[Bug target/105157] [12 Regression] compile-time regressions with generic tuning since r12-7756-g27d8748df59fe6

2022-04-08 Thread avieira at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105157 avieira at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug target/105157] [12 Regression] compile-time regressions with generic tuning since r12-7756-g27d8748df59fe6

2022-04-08 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105157 --- Comment #10 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Andre Simoes Dias Vieira : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5522dec054cb940fe83661b96249aa12c54c1d77 commit r12-8060-g5522dec054cb940fe83661b96249aa12c54c1d77 Author: Andre

[Bug target/105157] [12 Regression] compile-time regressions with generic tuning since r12-7756-g27d8748df59fe6

2022-04-06 Thread avieira at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105157 --- Comment #9 from avieira at gcc dot gnu.org --- Found the issue, it's due to the way we encode TARGET_CPU_DEFAULT in aarch64, it is only able to support 64 cores and we have 65 now. Testing a work around for now and we have plans to fix this

[Bug target/105157] [12 Regression] compile-time regressions with generic tuning since r12-7756-g27d8748df59fe6

2022-04-06 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105157 --- Comment #8 from Richard Biener --- Most of the compile-time is spent in scheduling, so I think the scheduling model was somehow exchanged.

[Bug target/105157] [12 Regression] compile-time regressions with generic tuning since r12-7756-g27d8748df59fe6

2022-04-06 Thread tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105157 --- Comment #7 from Tamar Christina --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #6) > More to the point the cited rev. doesn't look like it should change anything > for -mtune=generic. Maybe the "generic" config is always the last one on >

[Bug target/105157] [12 Regression] compile-time regressions with generic tuning since r12-7756-g27d8748df59fe6

2022-04-06 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105157 --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener --- More to the point the cited rev. doesn't look like it should change anything for -mtune=generic. Maybe the "generic" config is always the last one on aarch64 and now "demeter"? At least there doesn't

[Bug target/105157] [12 Regression] compile-time regressions with generic tuning since r12-7756-g27d8748df59fe6

2022-04-06 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105157 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||avieira at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug target/105157] [12 Regression] compile-time regressions with generic tuning since r12-7756-g27d8748df59fe6

2022-04-06 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105157 --- Comment #4 from Martin Liška --- Created attachment 52760 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52760=edit Test-case

[Bug target/105157] [12 Regression] compile-time regressions with generic tuning since r12-7756-g27d8748df59fe6

2022-04-06 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105157 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[12 Regression] |[12 Regression]