https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105938
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105938
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #5)
> I mean backport thereof to 12 branch.
Can you push it?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105938
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
I mean backport thereof to 12 branch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105938
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105938
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
That had a followup fix for nvptx, r13-285-ge7d9fdf5e0ee4c, which wasn't
backported yet it seems?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105938
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-bisection |
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105938
--- Comment #1 from Matthias Klose ---
$ cat libgcc2.i
int __subvti3_a, __subvti3_b;
void __subvti3() {
int w;
__builtin_sub_overflow(__subvti3_a, __subvti3_b, );
}
$ /home/packages/gcc/12/gcc-12-12.1.0/build-nvptx/gcc/xgcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105938
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105938
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needs-bisection
Target