[Bug target/105991] [12/13 Regression] rldicl+sldi+add generated instead of rldimi

2022-06-24 Thread segher at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105991 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED

[Bug target/105991] [12/13 Regression] rldicl+sldi+add generated instead of rldimi

2022-06-24 Thread roger at nextmovesoftware dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105991 Roger Sayle changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/105991] [12/13 Regression] rldicl+sldi+add generated instead of rldimi

2022-06-21 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105991 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Roger Sayle : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4306339798b6843937c628c5ece8c234b309b13d commit r13-1191-g4306339798b6843937c628c5ece8c234b309b13d Author: Roger Sayle Date: Wed J

[Bug target/105991] [12/13 Regression] rldicl+sldi+add generated instead of rldimi

2022-06-17 Thread roger at nextmovesoftware dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105991 Roger Sayle changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned at

[Bug target/105991] [12/13 Regression] rldicl+sldi+add generated instead of rldimi

2022-06-17 Thread segher at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105991 --- Comment #4 from Segher Boessenkool --- (In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #0) > It doesn't look like a wrong code problem, but it seems more optimal to use > rldimi (rotate left, mask insert) rather than rotate left by 0 bits, AND > wit

[Bug target/105991] [12/13 Regression] rldicl+sldi+add generated instead of rldimi

2022-06-16 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105991 --- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek --- Regtest/bootstrap passed on powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu. I did not test Ada.

[Bug target/105991] [12/13 Regression] rldicl+sldi+add generated instead of rldimi

2022-06-16 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105991 --- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek --- (In reply to Roger Sayle from comment #1) > The following patch appears to correct this for me on a cross-compiler to > powerpcle64, but it's tricky for me to do a full bootstrap/regression test. Thanks for

[Bug target/105991] [12/13 Regression] rldicl+sldi+add generated instead of rldimi

2022-06-16 Thread roger at nextmovesoftware dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105991 Roger Sayle changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/105991] [12/13 Regression] rldicl+sldi+add generated instead of rldimi

2022-06-15 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105991 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Host||powerpc64le-unknown-linux-g